Use uint64_t instead of ino_t
POSIX defines ino_t to be of an unsigned integer type, and searching around the net didn't tell me of any definitions conflicting that. So every ino_t can be represented in an uint64_t. (Assuming that is the largest integer type in use for an inode number, but I'm sure that assumption will hold for a while) (dev_t, on the other hand, is a bit messier. Still figuring out what to do with that.)
Please register or sign in to comment